<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikia Search Launches &#8211; Not Quite Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278</link>
	<description>The blog on design and technology by GoSquared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278/comment-page-1#comment-12634</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278#comment-12634</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the design didn&#039;t blow me away either - it doesn&#039;t look like much thought has gone into a consistent colour scheme, or the information architecture of the site design. The design generally is quite disjointed, especially when you follow a link to a Wikipedia style page.

I agree Valzilla, or perhaps it would have made more sense if they built a search engine that simply focused on searching wikis.

Also, Google didn&#039;t become *the* search engine by making you sign up before being able to change your personal search settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the design didn&#8217;t blow me away either &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t look like much thought has gone into a consistent colour scheme, or the information architecture of the site design. The design generally is quite disjointed, especially when you follow a link to a Wikipedia style page.</p>
<p>I agree Valzilla, or perhaps it would have made more sense if they built a search engine that simply focused on searching wikis.</p>
<p>Also, Google didn&#8217;t become *the* search engine by making you sign up before being able to change your personal search settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278/comment-page-1#comment-12632</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278#comment-12632</guid>
		<description>Not that this is really a key point, but the design isn&#039;t that great, in my opinion. It just looks to me like all of those &quot;fake&quot; websites out there - simplified graphics, not much unity, large text... eh. Google will not be effected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that this is really a key point, but the design isn&#8217;t that great, in my opinion. It just looks to me like all of those &#8220;fake&#8221; websites out there &#8211; simplified graphics, not much unity, large text&#8230; eh. Google will not be effected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valzilla2cool</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278/comment-page-1#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>valzilla2cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/278#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>I think they should just make it a search engine of academic texts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should just make it a search engine of academic texts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
