<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s &#8220;Brick&#8221; Concept &#8211; Where did the Computer Go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493</link>
	<description>Liquidicity - the blog on design and technology by GoSquared</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RabidZombie</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-115900</link>
		<dc:creator>RabidZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-115900</guid>
		<description>See, the first thing I thought when I heard &quot;the Brick&quot; was that the computer would actually ship in a state where it&#039;s not functional in anyway. But yeah, I don&#039;t think even Apple are than &quot;innovative&quot;.

As for the computer being entirely enclosed in the keyboard, no thanks. I personally like moving my keyboard around frequently for comfort. I don&#039;t want added weight. Added thickness is also a huge no. Didn&#039;t we move away from computers with that design for a reason anyway?

@Jenn: Not ingenious. It&#039;s been done before, many times. In fact, I think there&#039;s similar on the market already, not not by Apple (so it can run what whatever you like, including OS X if you know what you&#039;re doing). It&#039;s name escape me, however.

@Freddywang: I could have sworn you were going to say Chick Wheel then... http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple_introduces_revolutionary

@G: Microsoft didn&#039;t learn anything obviously, since they&#039;re still trying to get 100% touch interface down. I suspect they&#039;ll be able to do it, but I don&#039;t think a lot of people actually want to replace tactile input with touch screens just yet. I, for one, can&#039;t stand typing on a touch screen for extended periods of time.

Lengthy comment is lengthy. And out of date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, the first thing I thought when I heard "the Brick" was that the computer would actually ship in a state where it's not functional in anyway. But yeah, I don't think even Apple are than "innovative".</p>
<p>As for the computer being entirely enclosed in the keyboard, no thanks. I personally like moving my keyboard around frequently for comfort. I don't want added weight. Added thickness is also a huge no. Didn't we move away from computers with that design for a reason anyway?</p>
<p>@Jenn: Not ingenious. It's been done before, many times. In fact, I think there's similar on the market already, not not by Apple (so it can run what whatever you like, including OS X if you know what you're doing). It's name escape me, however.</p>
<p>@Freddywang: I could have sworn you were going to say Chick Wheel then... <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple_introduces_revolutionary" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple_introduces_revolutionary</a></p>
<p>@G: Microsoft didn't learn anything obviously, since they're still trying to get 100% touch interface down. I suspect they'll be able to do it, but I don't think a lot of people actually want to replace tactile input with touch screens just yet. I, for one, can't stand typing on a touch screen for extended periods of time.</p>
<p>Lengthy comment is lengthy. And out of date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-71069</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-71069</guid>
		<description>I think Freddywang has got a good idea there.

There have been a lot of rumours surrounding the possibility of Apple one day, at some point, releasing a tablet computer.

I have doubts as to how &quot;Mac&quot;ish it will be - I would assume that it would run a variant of the iPhone OS rather than a scaled down version of Mac OS X as it would be touch screen, and Mac OS X is designed for use with a traditional keyboard and mouse. Microsoft proved that you can&#039;t simply take an existing OS and expect people to use it successfully as a touch screen with their own XP for tablet PCs. They weren&#039;t a runaway success.

However, in terms of this being a new computer, I think it could have a dual purpose. You could take it around as a powerful device, slightly less powerful than a MacBook, but more powerful than an iPhone. Then when you get to your desk, where your existing Mac is, it could double up as a touch screen input - a kind of trackpad like on the new MacBooks, but with a screen.

Imagine that - controlling your Mac with a touch screen device as good as the iPhone but with more screen space. With the option to add shortcuts depending on which application you were using at any one time, with instant access to your frequently used apps via a touch screen dock, and even the ability to use it as a graphics tablet in applications like Photoshop and Corel Painter.

The New Apple DisplayBoard. Because we need more than Keys.

Haha, that would be cool.

Anyway, that&#039;s just my added 2 cents!

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Freddywang has got a good idea there.</p>
<p>There have been a lot of rumours surrounding the possibility of Apple one day, at some point, releasing a tablet computer.</p>
<p>I have doubts as to how "Mac"ish it will be - I would assume that it would run a variant of the iPhone OS rather than a scaled down version of Mac OS X as it would be touch screen, and Mac OS X is designed for use with a traditional keyboard and mouse. Microsoft proved that you can't simply take an existing OS and expect people to use it successfully as a touch screen with their own XP for tablet PCs. They weren't a runaway success.</p>
<p>However, in terms of this being a new computer, I think it could have a dual purpose. You could take it around as a powerful device, slightly less powerful than a MacBook, but more powerful than an iPhone. Then when you get to your desk, where your existing Mac is, it could double up as a touch screen input - a kind of trackpad like on the new MacBooks, but with a screen.</p>
<p>Imagine that - controlling your Mac with a touch screen device as good as the iPhone but with more screen space. With the option to add shortcuts depending on which application you were using at any one time, with instant access to your frequently used apps via a touch screen dock, and even the ability to use it as a graphics tablet in applications like Photoshop and Corel Painter.</p>
<p>The New Apple DisplayBoard. Because we need more than Keys.</p>
<p>Haha, that would be cool.</p>
<p>Anyway, that's just my added 2 cents!</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddywang</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-70985</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddywang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-70985</guid>
		<description>Or it can be a totally enclosed box removing all keyboard buttons. Apple  might think of a way to replace them with touch pad that detects keyboard input as well. 

Just imagine a keyboard size of mac gadget with latest multi touch technology that beautifully decorates your work desk.  I guess I dream too much of an iPhone as desktop mac :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it can be a totally enclosed box removing all keyboard buttons. Apple  might think of a way to replace them with touch pad that detects keyboard input as well. </p>
<p>Just imagine a keyboard size of mac gadget with latest multi touch technology that beautifully decorates your work desk.  I guess I dream too much of an iPhone as desktop mac :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-67351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-67351</guid>
		<description>I have to say that the idea of having the computer inside the keyboard is quite ingenious... perhaps not so much when you think it&#039;s already used for laptops- but in terms of a desktop, I think it&#039;s pretty damn ingenious. It would be nice, too. I&#039;m sick of having a giant, clunky tower taking up valuable desk real estate.

Whether or not it&#039;s something they are going to do now, obviously we don&#039;t know. But it would be cool to see something like this from them in the near future; I&#039;d definitely go for the buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that the idea of having the computer inside the keyboard is quite ingenious... perhaps not so much when you think it's already used for laptops- but in terms of a desktop, I think it's pretty damn ingenious. It would be nice, too. I'm sick of having a giant, clunky tower taking up valuable desk real estate.</p>
<p>Whether or not it's something they are going to do now, obviously we don't know. But it would be cool to see something like this from them in the near future; I'd definitely go for the buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-66823</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-66823</guid>
		<description>John, you raise a very good point. However, what about the number of laptops in use today? Surely, there aren&#039;t THAT many cases of spillages on the keyboard? Although, saying that, I have a friend who drowned their PowerBook in cappuccino...

I guess people will just have to be more careful with their Starbucks purchases when using it ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, you raise a very good point. However, what about the number of laptops in use today? Surely, there aren't THAT many cases of spillages on the keyboard? Although, saying that, I have a friend who drowned their PowerBook in cappuccino...</p>
<p>I guess people will just have to be more careful with their Starbucks purchases when using it <img src='http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-66804</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-66804</guid>
		<description>Clever, but I doubt it. Having been an IT guy for a few years, I can say with confidence that spills on a keyboard are so common that it&#039;s not really wise to put the computer in the keyboard. They keyboard is essentially disposable, the computer isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever, but I doubt it. Having been an IT guy for a few years, I can say with confidence that spills on a keyboard are so common that it's not really wise to put the computer in the keyboard. They keyboard is essentially disposable, the computer isn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-66739</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-66739</guid>
		<description>I agree, there are disadvantages to the third suggestion.

The thing is, all that would need to be connected by plugs is a display and a power cord. The rest could be wireless - bluetooth mouse, and 802.11n. The display would no doubt have a USB hub inbuilt so any hard drives etc. could plug in there.

Sure it&#039;s a long stretch, but it&#039;s quite a unique concept that is the sort of thing Apple would release.

Also, while thinking of negatives, the current Mac Mini is very versatile, and is even rack mounted in server rooms for space saving hosting. This idea would severely reduce the versatility of the Mini.

But hey, ideas, that&#039;s all they are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, there are disadvantages to the third suggestion.</p>
<p>The thing is, all that would need to be connected by plugs is a display and a power cord. The rest could be wireless - bluetooth mouse, and 802.11n. The display would no doubt have a USB hub inbuilt so any hard drives etc. could plug in there.</p>
<p>Sure it's a long stretch, but it's quite a unique concept that is the sort of thing Apple would release.</p>
<p>Also, while thinking of negatives, the current Mac Mini is very versatile, and is even rack mounted in server rooms for space saving hosting. This idea would severely reduce the versatility of the Mini.</p>
<p>But hey, ideas, that's all they are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin A. Wendelboe</title>
		<link>http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/archives/493/comment-page-1#comment-66738</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin A. Wendelboe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gosquared.com/liquidicity/?p=493#comment-66738</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how the 3rd suggestion of yours would even compare to an iMac unless Apple created some &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; innovative way of connecting it to power and displays.. If it wasn&#039;t ultra-portable and ultra-pluggable (Yeah.. That&#039;s right.. Ultra-pluggable.. Don&#039;t forget where you heard it first!), I&#039;d way rather have the power of iMac..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see how the 3rd suggestion of yours would even compare to an iMac unless Apple created some <i>very</i> innovative way of connecting it to power and displays.. If it wasn't ultra-portable and ultra-pluggable (Yeah.. That's right.. Ultra-pluggable.. Don't forget where you heard it first!), I'd way rather have the power of iMac..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
